This is an addendum to the notice of lis pendens below filed on the deed on the property 9398 N. Old Trail Ln. - Parcel 88-01-31-300-004. This web page was referenced on the notice filed with the county on May 10 2000
and serves as an extension of that notice.
This case is currently pending before the United States Supreme Court.
More information relating to this property can be fount at:
Below is the original document I filed on the deed. Additionally, I want to make it clear that this is MY LAND and that if you buy it from my ex-wife I will continue to pursue litigation to recover my property.
Potential buyers should be fully informed about the history of litigation involving this property and make an informed decision as to whether or not this property is free and clear. Even if you successfully buy this
property, you may never sucessfully sell it.
Legal Notification to Potential Buyers
Original Document
Notice Of Lis Pendens
To whom it may concern: Pursuant to RSMo 527.260, this property is the subject of pending lawsuits. Interested parties should check with both parties as to the status of these cases. This NOTICE is provided for anyone interested in the following property: 9398 N. Old Trail Ln. - Parcel 88-01-31-300-004
Term of Court: Open All Year
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT GREENE COUNTY MISSOURI
Marc Perkel )
)
vs. ) No. 198CC1666
)
Vicki Stringfellow )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT GREENE COUNTY MISSOURI
Marc Perkel )
)
vs. ) No. 198CC1753
)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT GREENE COUNTY MISSOURI
Vicki Stringfellow )
In Re the Marriage of: )
VICKI LORRAINE PERKEL and ) No. 194DR3198
MARC PERKEL )
)
)
In the Missouri Court of Appeals
Southern District
|
Marc Perkel, Plaintiff/Appellant, Vicki Stringfellow Defendant/Respondent |
) ) ) ) ) |
Appeals: 22948, 22947 Case No.: 198CC1753, 198CC1666
|
Contact Information:
Marc Perkel
309 North Jefferson #220
Springfield Mo. 65802 417-866-1222 (office)
marc@perkel.com (email)Representing Vicki Stringfellow
The law firm of Sharp and Bredesen
Suite 104
300 Hammons Parkway
Springfield, Mo. 65802
417-881-0010
FURTHERMORE: Marc Perkel states the following facts based upon his knowledge and belief.
The final judgement in the divorce case 194CC3198 relies on findings of the court from a maintenance hearing where the findings were never signed by anyone and the author of those findings is unknown. I have reason to believe the order is a forgery and/or was obtained through fraudulent means. The unsigned document, purported to be an order of the court, can be viewed on the Internet at:
http://www.perkel.com/pbl/married/signed/davis.htmThe finial judgement was appealed to the Southern District Court of Appeals, Case No. 21362-1. The final judgement in this appeal was never signed by a judge and is therefore a void judgement. Technically, this divorce is still pending before the court of appeals. The orders denying reconsideration and denying transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court were never signed by a judge. The decision by the Missouri Supreme Court denying transfer was also not signed by a judge. All these cases were signed by a clerk, and I have verified to the best of my ability that there exists no copy in the files with a judge's signature.
The lower court without prejudice dismissed the cases 198CC1666 and 198CC1753. On appeal, the Southern District Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal, but a judge never signed the decision in these two appeals. Furthermore, in upholding the dismissal, the court never decided the underlying question as to the validity of judgements that lack the signature of a judge. The court decided to not decide, and that decision to not decide was not properly signed.
The signature requirement by a judge is firmly established both in the Missouri Rules of Court (Rule 74.01a) and Missouri case law. Every case that I am aware of establishes the signature of a judge as a "bright line test". These cases include but are not limited to, Slay v. Slay, 965 S.W.2d at 845; Leonard O. Larue V. Janette Lohman, Case # 71802; Keck v. Keck No. 75021 (Mo.App. ED 05/11/1999); Martin v. Director of Revenue State of Missouri, 10 S.W.3d 618 (Mo.App. E.D. 02/15/2000); Lowery v. Air Support International, Inc., 971 S.W.2d 323, 324 (Mo.App. S.D. 1998); Rufus Rhine V. M. E. Montgomery, Magistrate Judge Of Scott County, Missouri, 422 S.W.2d 661; Griffen v. Griffen, 327 U.S. 220, 66 S. Ct. 556, 90 L. Ed. 635.
The following web page has detailed information on the subject including citations of case law that relates to this subject. Any lawyer evaluating these property rights should read this web page and consider these relevant cases:
http://www.perkel.com/pbl/married/signed/movoid.htmFurthermore, because none of these cases were fully litigated, the property hasn't been legally been separated and may be subject to unpaid federal and state taxes owed by the litigants and there may be IRS and state liens that apply to this property. I believe that RSMo 527.260 requires me to post this warning. Pending issues of attorney misconduct, fraud, fraud upon the court, and evidence tampering might also affect this property.
Furthermore, due to the dynamic nature and complexity of this litigation, I, Marc Perkel, have established a web site where I am posting, as an extension of this Lis Pendens, additional and current information regarding the status of this property. You are hereby notified pursuant to RSMo 527.260 that the following URL may contain additional information as to the status of litigation that may affect this property.
http://www.perkel.com/pbl/pendens.htmState of Missouri
________________________________
Marc Perkel
County of Greene
Subscribed and Sworn to me this 10th day of May 2000.
________________________________
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Legal description of property. 77.9 acres
9398 North Old Trail Ln. - 88-01-31-300-004
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-SIX (36), TOWNSHIP THIRTY-ONE (31) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY-ONE (21) WEST, GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI, THENCE NORTH 01ø32'16" EAST TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE TRACT DEEDED TO W.M. FARMER IN BOOK 1304 AT PAGE 157, IN THE GREENE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE SOUTH 88ø22'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 258.00 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE NORTH 11ø59'10" EAST A DISTANCE OF 203.31 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-ONE (31), TOWNSHIP THIRTY-ONE (31) NORTH, RANGE TWENTY (20) WEST; THENCE SOUTH 88ø22'OO" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 2348.65 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-ONE (31); THENCE SOUTH 01ø48'31" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-ONE (31) A DISTANCE OF 255.98 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF LITTLE POMME DE TERRE RIVER; THENCE SOUTH 15ø54'14" WEST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 140.71 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 61ø09'01" WEST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 201.76 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 03ø41'43" WEST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 166.60 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 08ø20'14" EAST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 335.79 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 79ø31'04" WEST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 111.49 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 52ø59'10" WEST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 115.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 19ø00'54" WEST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 154.29 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 02ø18'25" WEST ALONG SAID RIVER A DISTANCE OF 472.36 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER; THENCE NORTH 88ø22'00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2231.70 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION THIRTY-SIX (36); THENCE SOUTH 01ø32'16" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 980.43 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL BEING IN GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI, EXCEPT THAT PART DEEDED TO PLUMMER IN BOOK 1992 AT PAGE 875, IN THE GREEN COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, AND ALSO EXCEPT ANY PART THEREOF DEEDED, TAKEN, OR USED FOR ROAD, STREET, OR HIGHWAY PURPOSES.
Also, a non-exclusive perpetual roadway extending 30 feet on either side of the following described center line;
Commencing at an iron pin accepted as the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section Six (6), Township Thirty (30), Range Twenty (20), thence South 88ø56' East, 2024.48 feet, for a point of beginning; thence North 3ø19'17" East, 1319.06 feet; thence North 62ø10'48" West, 348.15 feet; thence North 7ø06'54" East, 890.21 feet; thence North 3ø52'42" East 498.92 feet, thence continuing Northerly to the South boundary of the above described tract in Section 31, Township 30, Range 20.
Also, a permanent non-exclusive easement along an existing road extending from the South right of way line of old 65 Highway in a Southerly direction more or less along the West line of Section 31, Township 30, Range 20.
|
Case Law $7/Month 50 States + Fed
I use this service.
